Wednesday, March 11, 2009

On a Personal Note

I feel it is time that I spoke my personal opinion on some things that have occurred over the last couple years, regarding the silver color in pugs.

I have been a member of the Pug Dog Club of America for the past 12 years; as such, I naively thought that would afford me some respect for my work all these years with the silver Pug, within that organization. I found that was not the case at all. For many years, I have tried to persuade them to allow me to present a program on my silvers and my research to date, to no avail. It was at least 4 or 5 years ago that I first (officially) proposed presenting a one-hour program, several members of the board of directors at that time wanted to call me before the ethics committee, accusing me of having gone against our code of ethics. That time, a friend who was on the board, did defend me, and assured them of my ethics as a breeder; that I was doing this solely for my own purpose, and not to capitalize on them. She also defended the fact that this is a naturally occurring color in our breed, and as a result they simply denied my request.
I have always made it known that I would gladly be available to talk with them openly about my breeding program, and that I would share any information I had managed to learn or discover both on my own, and through my associations with respected researchers, such as Dr. Schmutz in Canada.


In 2006, the PDCA nationals were held in Wisconsin, near where I lived at the time. I felt this was the perfect time to introduce the silvers to the membership; three of my close friends had been training 5 of my silver–colored pugs in obedience, in preparation for showing them at this national. This was the one venue in which they could be shown at an AKC show, and not be discriminated against because of their color. I had purposely NOT exhibited them in the conformation ring, for fear of the “shock value”, and confusing the judges. (This had been part of my program, to educate the judges after recognition by PDCA…).


I was pleasantly surprised by the overall reaction of the members to seeing the silvers at the nationals; most people were interested, and commented favorably on their conformation, as well as their color. There had been “rumblings” of the board possibly asking me to present my program, finally, but that thought quietly ‘went away’, and nothing was ever said. None of the board members or officers of the club even recognized publicly that the silvers were there in attendance.


About the same time, the big controversy over the awarding of a ribbon to a “brindle” pug in Canada became the focus of Pug people all over the U.S., and the world. PDCA wanted to be sure that no brindle was ever allowed in the U. S. show ring, so they began looking at the wording of the AKC standard for the pug, which had stood for over 100 years. Allowed colors were fawn, silver-fawn, and black. There was no mention of the word, “disqualification”, and there never had been. They appointed a committee to revise the standard. It took a year to come up with wording that the general membership would agree to, but that particular wording also put an end to my hopes of having the silver color recognized in pugs. (At least for the next five years – the standard can be revised no more often than every five years). People that I knew on the board of PDCA stood by and did nothing to help the cause of the silvers, throwing themselves completely behind the new wording that now makes any other color than fawn or black a disqualification.


Needless to say, I am disappointed in the Pug Dog Club of America, to put it mildly. In their efforts to deny the brindle in pugs, they also purposely denied the silvers. Therefore, I have let my membership in this organization lapse, and I am no longer a member of PDCA.
I have always thought that the board of any club was there to listen to its members. I’ve tried to talk them multiple times, in different approaches, but they turned a deaf ear or simply refused to hear me. I know they did not want to deal with “another color” – it’s not fawn, and it’s not black; therefore, apparently it cannot be Pug, despite my proof of history, and ongoing research. It really wasn’t all that long ago the black pugs were battling the same issue of color and acceptance. But their breeders did manage to overcome the hurtle; the blacks are recognized, and are slowly becoming more popular. I can only hope it won’t take another 50 years or more before PDCA and AKC accept and recognize the silvers.


I want to emphasize that this is my personal opinion. I have always believed that the silver pug has a place in history, and is an important part of the gene pool of the Pug breed, both past, present and future.

8 comments:

  1. Hello. I just got a silver pug. Never knew they existed. They are pretty rare I hear.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've heard that it is not genetically possible for any other colors but Black and Fawn for the breed. If this is true, how do you account for the color variants you breed? If it is not true why would the PDCA arbitrarily discount your breeding program? Logically a greater diversity in pure pug bloodlines would be desirable for so many reasons, not the least of which is a healthier animal. I would be curious to know your thoughts regarding this. I currently own 3 fawn pugs and have all their pedigrees back five generations...which in years is not that far but I have access to their line pedigrees going back much much farther. How far back does your genetic research go? Have you conducted and published DNA test of your pugs and if so, is this research available for viewing? How does the DNA match up to a Fawn or Black? In theory, it should be identical...Unless Fawn and Black pugs are actually "missing" the genes your pugs have...Hmmm. Anyway, I'm just curious. I'm not judging you or your breeding program or your motives...I'm just curious.
    Sincerely, P. Lauer

    ReplyDelete
  3. First of all: I adore your silver pugs!
    I’ve read your website very often and also made research by my self. I think for some people it would be helpfully to READ before they answer … because if they had read your report they would not ask superfluous questions and would notice that there is nothing curious. Also a pedigree with 20 generation can not tell you something about the colors in the lines, as long as breeder are compelled to indicate wrong colors because of the breed standard.
    The silver pugs are much healthier as the light fawn which are popular now, they have for example a much better immune system, their aural is better and their skin much healthier. It seems the preferred show pugs today get lighter and lighter, they even have no trace anymore. Is that what they want? Pugs without color? Most of this fawn have skin disease and weak fascia. Their immune system is bad and therefore disease like Demodectic Mange are today common again in the pug breed. I only can confirm that the silver can only bring the best into the breed, health, better colors and pigmentation in their fawn offspring…and much more.
    At the end I would like to answer to the last poster, P. Lauer: Your question was “How far back does your genetic research go?“
    Is 1891 far enough for you? This is what Stonhenge wrote in his book „The Dogs of Great Britain, America and other Countries…“
    THE PUG
    (...) During the decade 1840-1850, several admirers of pugs attempted to breed them from good foreign strains. Foremost among these was the then Lady Willoughby de Eresby, who, after a great deal of trouble, obtained a dog from Vienna which has belonged to a Hungarian countess, but was of bad color, being a mixture of the stone-fawn now peculiar to the "Willoughby strain", and black; but the combination of these colors was to a certain extent in the brindled form. From accounts which are to be relied on, this dog was about twelve inches high, and of good shape, both in body and head but had a a face much longer than would be approved of by pug fanciers. In 1846 he was mated with a fawn bitch imported from Holland, of the desired color, viz., stone-fawn in body, with black mask and trace, but with no indication of brindle. She had a shorter face and heavier jowl than the dog, and was altogether in accordance with the type now recognized as the correct "Willoughby Pug" From this pair are descended all the strain named after Lady Willoughby de Eresby, which are marked in color by their peculiar cold stone-fawn, and the excess of black often showing itself, not in brindle stripes, but in entirely or nearly entirely black heads, and large "saddle marks"or wide "traces"(...)

    Ellen S. Brown wrote: „
    (...) The Willoughby Pugs were of darker color, sometimes called "pepper and salt", because of the mixture of fawn and black hair.(...)

    Read the descriptions …..darker color….sometimes called pepper and salt….mixture of stone-fawn and black…excess of black…..entirely or nearly entirely black heads and large saddle marks or wide traces….
    Stonehenge wrote: in a brindled form!!! He spoke old British English, brindle also means SPECKLED! (pepper and salt!!!!!!)
    Sorry but all this descriptions show exactly the silver-grey!!!!!!!!!

    Wilhelmia Swainston-Goodger, wrote in her book from a letter of Mrs Mayhew‘s son, in this letter he told her, belonging to the curious Willoughby Color, that at this time he saw many pups which were born nearly black.

    Sincerely Brigitte

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the interest, and the comments! It's nice to know at least a few people do read my blog! To (sort of) answer your question, P. Lauer, as to whether there has been genetic DNA research, yes, as far as we could go so far. It is unimaginably costly to fund research for one specific color, attribute or the like; Dr. Schmutz of Canada did do what research she could that was relevant to what she had funding for at the time, and that simply told us that this color gene does not have a "fatal" attribute. She also did tell us that the silver color gene is exactly the same as the fawn gene, to answer that question you asked. I am waiting for a study to begin, someday, that will address the silver color specifically, but no one knows for sure when/if that will happen. You can be sure that when it does happen, I will shout it to the world, no matter the outcome!
    Sandy Peterson, Kendra Pugs

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for the answer(s). If I am to understand you and the PDCA then, to me, it seems that the matter of color "standards" that the PDCA is driving is to focus breeding efforts on either fawn or black and that is it. For you then it is a matter of politics, not science, to get recognition and acceptance. I do not envy your task as there are few breeders willing to challenge the rule of the PDCA. Best of luck to you.

    P.Lauer

    ReplyDelete
  6. I feel sorry for people whose bigotry affects their judgement.

    To minimize a breed in only two colors, although there are much more in the genome, is science??????

    The saddest is that most of the breeder forgot the Code of Breeding Ethics!!
    Art. 10 Code of Breeding Ethics
    Breeding and development of dog breeds must be based on long-term objectives and sound principles so that the breeding does not result in diseases, bad temperament and lack of working skills.
    Breeding must serve the objective of preserving and preferably extending the genetic variety (polygenicity) of the breed.
    Only functionally healthy dogs are to be used for breeding. It lies with any breeder who selects a dog for breeding to determine whether this breeding animal is mentally and physically suited for breeding.
    The breeder has to ensure both good mental and physical conditions for breeding animals.
    As long as a puppy is in the breeder's custody, he must ensure a physically and mentally beneficial environment for the puppy to guarantee proper socialisation.

    I want to highlight this: preferably extending the genetic variety (polygenicity) of the breed !!!!!!!!!!

    There is no word about colors!!!! No word about shows!! No word to breed a dog like a template!!!
    And as said above, there is no health defect in the color silver-grey, but quite the opposite.

    Brigitte

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow this is really interesting. I would be very curious to find out what the DNA findings were. Color is such an interesting science in the animal world period. I have been told by many breeders that if a DNA test is done on a pug that is any color than black or fawn, that you will find evidence of another brachiocephalic breed such as a Frenchie or Boston. I am not 100% sold on that due to the fact that in horses you can do genetic testing for color to ensure you have the best possible chance of getting the color you desire in your breeding program..

    ReplyDelete
  8. Essay writing is something we've all been taught time after time in the many subjects we've had throughout our academic years. We are used to different guides and different "winning techniques" to help us write the best essay we can, however sometimes those guides are blurry and unclear. essay writing service

    ReplyDelete